Saturday, 29 November 2014

Drive by Daniel Pink




Book Review: Drive
As author Daniel H. Pink states in the Introduction, the theme of his book Drive is motivation. 

In the first part of his book, Pink identifies two basic societal operating systems or drives.  Motivation 1.0 consists of our basic biological drives, such as seeking food and shelter for survival. 

Motivation 2.0 is the extrinsic system of rewards and punishments (proverbial carrots and sticks) that has dominated the world of business and commerce as well as education since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution.   Pink argues that this system is passé and actually incompatible with psychology and current human enterprise: “Our current operating system has become far less compatible with, and at times downright antagonistic to: how we organize what we do; how we think about what we do; and how we do what we do.” (20) 

  1. How we organize what we do: Both open-source production (free services such as Wikipedia) and for-benefit, as opposed to for-profit, organizations are new business models that do not operate on traditional rewards systems.
  2.  How we think about what we do: People don’t always automatically choose the occupation or path that grants them the greatest tangible reward; instead, they do what they do “for significance-seeking, self-actualizing reasons.” (26)
  3. How we do what we do: Rewards and punishments work as motivators for the completion of routine tasks but are ineffective and even counterproductive for motivating people to solve the difficult challenges of the modern workplace.

In Chapter 2, Pink identifies 7 reasons why rewards and punishments don’t work:
  1. They have a negative impact on intrinsic motivation.  Rewards create what the author terms the Sawyer Effect – “They can transform an interesting task into a drudge” (35) because contingent (If-then) rewards create a loss of autonomy when it comes to performance.
  2. They can diminish performance.  Several studies are presented as evidence of this.
  3. They can crush creativity.  Contingent rewards narrow one’s focus in problem solving and stifle outside-the-box thinking.
  4. They can crowd out good behavior.  Rewards move the focus away from altruistic behavior.
  5. They can encourage unethical behavior.  “The problem with making an extrinsic reward the only destination that matters is that some people will choose the quickest route there, even if it means taking the low road” ie. cheating (49)
  6. They can become addictive.  “Rewards are addictive in that, once offered, a contingent reward makes [you] expect it whenever a similar task is faced.” (53)
  7. They can foster short-term thinking.  Once you receive the reward, your learning ends.

Pink acknowledges though that there are some occasions when rewards and punishments do work.  First, rewards do work as “healthy baselines” – that is, as perceived “adequate and fair” compensations in the forms of wages, salaries, and benefits. (58)   As well, rewards can be motivating for routine tasks that are neither particularly interesting nor require creative thinking.  The author suggests though that extrinsic rewards will work more effectively as motivators if they are offered only after the task is complete – that is, are viewed as now that as opposed to if-then. (64) 
In Part Two of Drive, Pink explores Motivation 3.0 – a “future-facing” operating system powered by three intrinsic desires: autonomy, mastery, and purpose.



The theme of Chapter 4 is autonomy.  Pink argues that a sense of autonomy has a powerfully positive effect on a person’s attitude and performance.  He is careful to define autonomy not as independence but rather as self-direction or acting with choice. (88)  

 Pink believes that businesses should grant employees autonomy over 4 aspects of work: 
·        Task (what people do) An example is Atlassian’s FedEx Days – days set aside 4 times a year during which employees can work on any project they wish, but with the promise of delivering a contribution overnight.

·        Time (when people work) Flip the model of work from “putting in time” to “getting results” (100) – a results-only work environment ROWE).

·        Technique (how people work) This involves giving employees “decision latitude”. (100)

·        Team (whom people work with) “Research has shown that people working in self-organized teams are more satisfied than those working in inherited teams.” (104)  Social networks make choice in collaboration more possible.



The author concludes the chapter on autonomy with a powerful statement: Motivation 3.0 “… presumes that people want to be accountable – and that making sure they have control over their task, their time, their technique, and their team is the most effective pathway to that destination.” (105)
Pink begins Chapter 5 by connecting autonomy with mastery:  “Control leads to compliance; autonomy leads to engagement” and “Only engagement can produce mastery.” (109)  Mastery results when companies employ two tactics.  First, employees are assigned what Pink calls Goldilocks tasks, “… challenges that are not too hot and not too cold, neither overly difficult nor overly simple.” (116)  When a task is too hard, it triggers anxiety; when it’s too easy, boredom sets in.  However, when it’s a Goldilocks task, the result is flow (engagement)


Three laws of mastery are posited:

·        Mastery is a mindset – It requires an attitude that values continuous learning;

·        Mastery is a pain - It requires one to have grit;

·        Mastery is an asymptote – You can get really close to it but never fully realize it.

Chapter 6 opens with Pink’s assertion that “The most deeply motivated people … hitch their desires to a cause larger than themselves.” (131)  Hence, to be successful, a business must place an emphasis on “purpose maximization”. (133)  One strategy for this is to spend less time on how to perform a particular task and more on why it is important.  Another suggested strategy is allowing employees to spend one day a week pursuing an aspect of their job that is most meaningful to them.  Lastly, “handing employees control over how the organization gives back to the community” will help them find meaning in their work. (140) 



Sunday, 9 November 2014

Teachable Moments

Ottawa - October 22, 2014
On Wednesday,October 22, Corporal Nathan Cirillo was shot to death by a lone gunman while he stood guard at the Cenotaph in the heart of downtown Ottawa.  The entire area was placed in lockdown for much of the day as the perimeter was swept by law enforcement officers.  Area schools were placed in Secure mode.
It was a teachable moment. 
EMS personel transport Cpl. Cirullo from theCenotaph  
Following the October 22 incident, there were many lessons which teachers conducted in elementary and secondary schools throughout the Nation's Capital.  In addition to reviewing the many safety protocols and measures in place in schools to keep students safe and secure, teachers used this terrible incident as an opportunity for students to learn about threats to public safety from radicalization and terrorism.  However, they also drew students attention to the remarkable way in which Canadians responded to the death of Corporal Cirillo.  Canadians reacted with sadness and an outpouring of sympathy for his family, but they also showed great resolve in refusing to be intimidated by those who threaten our peaceful, free and democratic society.  Canadians also displayed great pride and admiration for our men and women of the military who risk their lives in defence of our great country.

Flowers, flags, & poppies adorn the Tomb of The Unknown Soldier  
at the Cenotaph following the shooting of Corporal Nathan Cirillo
Students and teachers from St. Anthony School even went so far as to make time during a planned excursion to downtown Ottawa in late October to pay their respects to Corporal Cirillo by visiting the War Memorial.  An Ottawa Police Service officer was so struck by this gesture that he worked with others there to allow the students to gather beside the Grave of the Unknown Soldier to have their picture taken.

 On Friday, October 24, I was one of over a 100 Ottawa Catholic School Board employees who, in a spontaneous gesture of sympathy and resolve, spent lunch hour standing along West Hunt Club Road (outside our Catholic Education Centre) in order to watch the hearse bearing the remains of Corporal Cirillo make its way towards the Highway of Heroes and his final resting place in Hamilton, his home town.

The hearse bearing Cpl. Cirillo passes along West Hunt Club

Catholic Education Centre staff pay tribute to Cpl. Cirillo
 as his hearse passes by

Vimy Ridge Commemoration
Another teachable moment occurred several years ago when I was principal of Holy Trinity Catholic High School.
It started when a grade 10 student by the name of Lucas Wiseman came to see me about a multi-school trip overseas that was being arranged for April 2007.  The trip would be to France and Belgium as a part of the 90th anniversay of the successful Canadian assault on Vimy Ridge.

Each student was to select a Canadian soldier who was a casualty during this famous battle.  Lucas came to see me in my office because he recalled that, when I visited his history class, I had told the students that my great-grandfather Joe Dunlop had died at Vimy.  Lucas asked me if I would let him represent my grandfather.  I told Lucas I would be honoured and pleased.

My great-grandfather, Joe Dunlop
I shared some photos I had of Joe Dunlop and a copy of both his Attestation (enlistment) papers and Casualty Form. The latter indicated that Private Joe Dunlop died on April 13, 1917 from a gunshot wound received on April 9 - the first day of the assault on the ridge.

Casualty Report for Private Joe Dunlop
I had known from family history research I had previously conducted that Joe Dunlop was born of April 9, 1880, and the sad irony that he was fatally wounded on his birthday.  However, what Lucas revealed to me later was nothing short of remarkable - His birthday was also April 9!
The coincidences in this story were so striking that Global National did a feature on it on Remembrance Day 2006.

Global National Remembrance Day Feature - Nov. 11, 2006
Going overseas to Vimy to be a part of the ceremony commemorating the 90th anniversary of the assault, and representing Private Joe Dunlop, was a teachable moment for Lucas - one he would share with his children and grandchildren, as he said in the Global National feature.  It was also a teachable moment for me.  It not only taught me about the enormous impact that real-world learning can have on students but as well reassured me that our young people will not "break faith" with those brave soldiers who died in the defense of Canada. 

Private Joe Dunlop & Lucas Wiseman - share the same birthdate - April 9th