Book
Review: Elements of Grading by Douglas Reeves
The key
question that Doug Reeves addresses in Elements of Grading is as follows: How can we make grading
systems accurate, fair, specific, and timely?
Before
answering this question, Reeves establishes an important premise: The primary
purpose of grading is feedback to improve student achievement.Reeves begins his inquiry by discussing is what he terms “the grading debate” - that is, the distorted perceptions of some educators about the purpose of grading and their subsequent inaccurate, unfair, and non-specific practices. Reeves reveals the flawed logic behind the practice of assigning a zero for assessments not submitted. A teacher who gives a grade of zero in such situations is making a moral judgment that goes like this: The student deserves a zero as punishment, and this consequence is fair in that it teaches the student an important lesson. The flawed thinking here is, of course, that the “zero” is neither an accurate nor a fair assessment of the student’s academic achievement.
Accuracy: In his chapter on accuracy in grading, Reeves shows that the
practice of averaging undermines
accuracy in that it does not reflect current
student performance when the grade is awarded. In other words, it does not reflect the
student’s improved achievement over time or decline over time. He uses the following humorous analogy to
emphasize his point: “You would never
decide whether or not to wear a coat on January 31 based on the average
temperature during the month.”
Reeves
offers 3 strategies for improving accuracy in grading:- Reality checks – comparison of student results
in classes to external standardized measurements, and determination of
whether students are receiving behavioural grades.
- Collaborative scoring
- based
on common rubrics
- Avoidance of
mathematical distortions – for example, not assigning zeros for work not
submitted and not averaging marks
Specificity: According to Reeves, the most precise way to grade a student
is to report his/her performance relative to an objective standard.
Timeliness: Acknowledging Jeff Howard’s Nintendo Effect, which refers to the dramatic improvement in
performance that students can make when they receive immediate feedback, Reeves
provides 3 suggestions for teachers on how to improve timeliness:- Involve students
in establishing academic criteria – Once students know the rules of the game, they can
engage, with integrity, in self and peer assessment
- Use the 3-column
rubric - Have one column for performance
criteria, a second column for student self-assessment, and a third column for
teacher assessment
- Offer mid-course
corrections –
Since students who most need help do not usually ask for it, teachers must
schedule assistance and intervention.
-
Ensure
that assessments are focused and brief
-
Create
time for teachers to analyze and use feedback
-
Monitor
the responses of teachers to student achievement data
Reeves
concludes Elements of Grading by offering some advice for leaders on how
to successfully implement change to teachers’ grading practices: articulate an
explicit vision, specify behavioural expectations, and assess and continually
refine the implementation.